The Influence of the Grinding Tool on the Output

Grinding Wheel Selection

The primary considerations in choosing grinding wheel specifications for a par­ticular machining task are the grindability of the material and the output require­ments. From grinding wheel specifications, information regarding their appropri­ateness for a specific machining task can be derived.

Grain type is selected especially with a view to hardness, toughness and prone­ness to react with the workpiece material. The common abrasives corundum and silicon carbide exhibit considerably lower hardness values than boron nitride and diamond. Their thermal resistance is however significantly higher than that of diamond.

From the chemical affinity of various grain types to certain workpiece materi­als, we can designate different areas of application as represented in table 6-2. Due to the high price of such novel abrasives, the decision in favour of boron nitride instead of corundum or diamond instead of silicon carbide should only be made after a calculation of profitability.

Table 6-2. Chemical affinity between abrasives and workpiece materials

Abrasive

Chemical affinity to

Suitable for

Corundum, boron nitride

Oxides, glass, ceramics, stone

Steels of all qualities

Silicon carbide, diamond

Workpiece materials containing carbon (e. g. steels)

Carbon-saturated steels, cast iron, oxides, glass, ceramics

General predictions concerning the effects of grain types on the process and output are impossible, since the influence of further boundary conditions like the workpiece material must also be considered. Comparisons between silicon carbide and pure corundum grinding wheels with various workpiece materials have shown that, depending on the predominant wear mechanism, the cutting forces, rough­ness and thermal influence also behave differently. The key rule is that silicon carbide form more cutting edges per grain, so smaller chip thicknesses appear at each individual cutting edge as well as larger total cutting forces in general.

Grain size selection follows the criteria of

• target surface quality and

• desired material removal rate.

Table 6-3. Guidelines for selecting grain sizes

Grain size

Obtainable surface rough­ness

Maximum allowance

Machining stage

mesh

цт

цт

цт

46

320

5.0 to 2.4

Practically unlimited

Pre-grinding

80

200

2.5 to 1.5

1 % of the dw, not < 300

Finish-grinding

120

120

2.0 to 1.0

150 to 200

Fine grinding

200

80

1.6 to 0.7

50 to 100

Finest grinding

320

46

1.2 to 0.4

20

Finest grinding

Table 6-3 provides guidelines for choosing a suitable grain size. With increas­ing grain size, the number of cutting edges decreases. This leads in turn to larger chip thicknesses. The attainable surface quality becomes worse, but the possible material removal rate higher. Coarse granulations are therefore used for pre­grinding, fine granulations for finish-grinding. This allocation shows that a com­parison of grain sizes is always made with respect to the material removal rate. Every grain size is thus assigned to a certain task.

The assignment of a bond to the respective grinding task is performed in a very general way in the literature. Ceramic bonds are brittle and fracture-sensitive, syn­thetic resin bonds on the other hand are tough, elastic and insensitive to impact. The type and amount of bond, together with the grain size, has an effect on the structure and hardness of the grinding wheel [HAGE69, LEIC75].

Hard grinding wheels generally result in improved grinding conditions and ac­curate form and dimension. However, the cutting force and thermal stress on the workpiece also increase with grinding wheel hardness.

Updated: 24.03.2016 — 12:06